STATE CENSORSHIP IN THE MIDDLE OF A PRESS CONFERENCE

The government did everything possible to prevent the Kairos journalist from returning to the press conference on November 27, after more than 7 months of ban.

Once in the « bunker », thanks to his perseverance and his lawyer, Alexander De Croo probably avoided his question. While he insisted and asked 5 times for the floor, Alexander De Croo voluntarily put him last: thus, the control room could knowingly cut the microphone and the image, and thus censor him. 

This is a real scandal! 

ANY DIVERGENT SPEECH IS CENSORED. ALL DEMOCRATIC DEBATE IS PROHIBITED. 

The forbidden question was (waiting for the second explanatory video):
« Tens of thousands of unemployed people, a massive increase in suicides, exacerbated family violence, people put on the street, massive school dropout; divorces, alcoholism, social violence, growth of psychiatric cases, loss of reference points, especially among young people, totally unable to project themselves into the future, higher education students riveted in front of screens all day long, in depression, impoverished by the absence of jobs, homeless people who die even more numerous…

In order to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of the policy measures taken against Covid, when will you account for the social, economic, health consequences of these measures? Don’t you think that the supposed beneficial effects of these measures are outweighed by their dramatic consequences?