External contribution

Vaccinees still produce spike protein after two years

Contrary to what the authorities had claimed, Covid vaccines can modify DNA. Serious, long-term effects have been uncovered.

New research shows that Covid vaccines contain considerable proportions of DNA residues capable of permanently integrating into the human genome, causing chronic disease and cancer. This could also explain the excess mortality observed since the start of vaccination campaigns.

An article from Covidhub.ch*.

Act 1: disturbing blood tests

This investigation began with an intriguing publication by former Swiss banker Pascal Najadi. The author of a criminal complaint for abuse of power against the President of the Confederation Alain Berset is three times vaccinated and just as angry at the health authorities since a blood test revealed that his body continues to produce vaccine spike protein more than 18 months after his last Pfizer/BioNTech injection.

Contacted, the interested party provided us with the laboratory results, as well as a letter from Prof. Dr. G. B. B., the head of the laboratory. Sucharid Bhakdi confirmed that « the test results clearly indicate that Mr. Najadi is suffering irreparable long-term effects caused by the injected mRNA product manufactured by PfizerBiontech » (see resources at the end of the article).

A toxic protein

The banker’s blood tests revealed the presence of advanced protein, but not the nanolipid capsules found in injections. For the scientist, this indicates that the protein is not the result of the administration of a « vaccine », but has been recently produced by the body of the vaccinee.

A few searches later, we find a German lawyer, Mr Tobias Ulbrichrepresenting several customers who have also had their blood analyzed and come to the same conclusions as Pascal Najadi: their bodies are constantly producing peak protein, a toxic substance, and no one can tell them if or when it will stop.

Health authorities unable to explain

The former banker had contacted the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health about the matter. The latter was unable to give him any answers, arguing that he could not comment on an individual case. Pascal Najadi deduced from this that the board had no control over these new vaccine technologies.

The persistence of the peak protein detected in Najadi and other vaccinees remains officially unexplained, and is well beyond the 14 days communicated when the Covid vaccination campaigns were launched.

Act 2: the role of RNA

Everyone knows DNA, represented by a double helix and containing our genetic code. RNA consists of a single strand. The cell makes them as needed by reading part of the DNA, which it then uses to produce a protein.

One dose of Covid messenger RNA « vaccine » contains billions of strands of messenger RNA, which will trigger the production of as many of the SARS-CoV‑2 virus’ peak proteins in the cells where they arrive. These advanced proteins activate an immune system response.

In theory and officially — all the health authorities have insisted on this to reassure future vaccinees — Covid « vaccines » contain no DNA and there is no permanent alteration of our cells.

As we shall see, serious doubts unfortunately cast a shadow over official assertions.

The advanced protein was also presented as a harmless substance during vaccination campaigns, whereas it is known to be toxic to the human body and causes most of the complications of Covid, including inflammatory and allergic reactions.

Act 3: How are the strands of messenger RNA found in Covid « vaccines » manufactured?

To communicate, bacteria exchange important genetic « messages » using what are known as plasmids. For example, if a bacterium finds a new mechanism that increases its resistance to antibiotics, it will encapsulate this information in plasmids, which will be produced and ‘spread’ to other bacteria.

The process of manufacturing the RNA strands for Covid vaccines involves the genetic manipulation of bacteria using plasmids, into which the DNA sequence corresponding to the SARS-CoV‑2 peak protein has been introduced.

The plasmid is multiplied in bacteria and used as a template to mass-produce messenger RNA that will be able to trigger peak protein production in the cells of vaccinees. The DNA must then be removed and the messenger RNA mixed with lipids to produce nanoparticles capable of delivering the mRNA into our cells. We shall see that this is not the case.

Act 4: The bug in the matrix

It should be noted that the health authorities do not themselves check the various batches to ensure vaccine quality. Manufacturers alone are responsible for quality assurance of the products they market.

When Pfizer granted marketing authorization for its vaccine, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) had to be content with consulting the data supplied by the manufacturer. The AEM expressed surprise to the manufacturer that the final product had not been genetically sequenced to ensure that it contained only messenger RNA and no DNA or other residues, as German scientist Florian Schilling explains in a presentation (see resources).

Pfizer replied that it had voluntarily renounced sequencing, admitting that it was certainly not optimal, but that it was justified in order to reduce costs. Other manufacturers have also waived genetic sequencing as part of their quality assurance.

One of the alternative product evaluation techniques used by Pfizer is electrophoresis, which allows the elements present in a solution to be counted according to their size.

In the documents provided by Pfizer to the AEM, a diagram of which is reproduced below, the messenger RNA of the vaccine peak protein is represented by a high central peak. The anomaly is the « slopes » on either side of the peak, which represent mysterious genetic « objects » that don’t match the size of messenger RNA and shouldn’t be present in a purified solution.

The AEM wanted to know more, and asked Pfizer for the raw data. The manufacturer had undertaken to supply them, but to date they have still not been delivered.

Act 5: independent researchers come into play

A group of researchers, concerned in particular about the consequences of Covid injections for young people, decided in early 2023 to take matters into their own hands and sequence batches of Pfizer and Moderna « vaccines ». Their entire approach is explained in detail in an initial article and its companion piece by Kevin McKernan, a molecular biologist specializing in genetic manipulation and sequencing, who took part in the analysis.

Their findings are disturbing in nature:

  • Abnormally high levels of DNA — The presence of plasmids containing advanced protein DNA was confirmed in considerable proportions for Pfizer and Moderna « vaccines »: between 20 and 35%, well above the contamination limits set by the AEM (0.033%). A single dose therefore contains several billion of these plasmids, which were used to produce the messenger RNA and should then have been eliminated. This information is already proof that these products do not comply with current regulations.
  • Accelerating antibiotic resistance — Worryingly, the DNA of these plasmids contains genes that make them resistant to two antibiotics: neomycin and kanamycin. The introduction of billions of antibiotic resistance genes into plasmids with high replication capacity, enabling the selection of bacteria resistant to these treatments in the microbiome, should raise concerns about the acceleration of antibiotic resistance on a global scale. Even before the Covid crisis, some experts were already estimating that by 2050 we’d run out of effective antibiotics.
  • High copy error factor — Scientists say that the presence of a nucleotide called pseudouridine is very worrying, as it is reputed to have a copy error rate of one in every 4,000 nucleotides. This represents between 5 and 8.5 million possible copy errors per vaccine dose. And no one can say what these errors correspond to, as they are unpredictable.
  • Permanent and transgenerational integration — Vaccine plasmids can reach bacteria or human cells. This last case is considered problematic, as it is possible that the DNA strand contained in the plasmid is permanently integrated into the genetic code of the human cell, enabling it at any time to produce the vaccine peak protein autonomously, for the rest of its life. In all likelihood, this is what is happening to Pascal Najadi and Me Ulbrich’s clients in Germany. Prof. Dr. Bhakdi pointed out that each cell division is an opportunity for this imported DNA to modify the host genome. If this integration takes place in a stem cell, egg or sperm cell, the genetic modification will be passed on to subsequent generations. This is a serious matter, because science today does not offer a tool for removing a gene.

More incomprehensibly, the DNA of the plasmid used by Pfizer contains a sequence (SV 40) which enables it to be transferred into the nucleus even when the cell is not dividing, thus affecting cells. However, its presence is unnecessary for the production of messenger RNA in bacteria. This sequence is absent from the plasmids used by Moderna.

Johnson & Johnson’s Covid vaccine poses an even greater risk of integration, as it is based on a DNA virus and uses a much more powerful promoter than SV 40, called CMV. This leads to a much higher risk of oncogenesis and continuous peak protein production than with messenger RNAs, » says Marc Wathelet, a molecular biologist and coronavirus specialist we consulted.

Since the DNA of the plasmid’s lead protein targets mammalian cells, there’s very little chance of permanent integration into the genome of an intestinal bacterium. While they may not become state-of-the-art protein factories, these bacteria — which are not human cells — could multiply vaccine plasmids, thereby increasing the risk of contamination of human cells, known as « bactofection » or « transfection ».

Act 6: the consequences — risk of cancer

Marc Wathelet confirms that while « the risk of contamination of microbiome bacteria remains low, it is the risks of inflammation and, above all, cancer linked to DNA contamination of the body cells of vaccinees that are more worrying ». The expert stresses that it is « impossible to quantify this risk ». He notes « an increase in certain cancers, but we don’t know whether this is due to the DNA, the mRNA, the weakened immune system, the lipids present in the nanoparticles, or a combination of these factors ».

The integration of advanced protein DNA may explain why the effects are not immediate after vaccination, but develop over time. Some scientists link the excess mortality observed in 2022 in all vaccinated countries with the ongoing production of advanced protein. An analysis by Jarle Aarstad points in this direction, demonstrating a worrying correlation: for every percentage point increase in the vaccination rate, there is a 0.1% increase in excess mortality the following year.

Act 7: And now what?

If future vaccinees had been warned that they were about to be injected with genetic material that was likely to integrate into their own genome, how many would still have accepted the injection?

The health authorities need to become aware of the problem and carry out genetic analyses on vaccinated individuals to see to what extent this vaccine DNA is integrated into human cells, and in which cell types.

Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi recently argued that messenger RNA vaccines are in fact gene therapies that should be withdrawn from the market. This is all the more important as, boosted by huge profits, the vaccine industry is currently investing in the development of hundreds of new messenger RNA vaccines.

We’re still in the experimental stage

Whatever the mainstream media and authorities may say, science continues to assert that these gene therapies are still only at the experimental stage, as attested by this excerpt published in Nature in July 2022:

« Although they offer several advantages over conventional protein-based approaches, mRNA-based therapies are still in the early stages of development. The instability of synthetic mRNAs and the immune responses generated against these synthetic molecules have been the main obstacles to the adaptation of this technology. » Nature, Scientific Reports, July 2022

For people like Pascal Najadi who are affected by this permanent production of advanced protein, they are currently forced to take lifelong treatments to reduce its concentration. Their immune system is constantly busy eliminating their own cells that produce the peak protein, but these continue to multiply with the genetic modification, making this a permanent and exhausting battle for the body.

Proven in human liver cancer cells 

One study, Alden et al, showed that human liver cancer cells could permanently integrate genetic material from Pfizer vaccines. Critics claimed that no conclusions could be drawn for healthy cells. However, these results should have called into question the use of these products in cancer patients.

Comparison with PCR tests

The silence on the contamination of Covid injections by DNA is all the more striking when we recall that, in the days of PCR testing, it was enough to detect in our nose a few viral debris incapable of reproducing, with a number of working cycles (CT, amplification) close to 40, to be declared positive and quarantined.

The DNA contamination we’re talking about here in vaccines can already be detected at a CT of 20. This is a concentration a million times higher than what was considered critical for SARS-CoV‑2, and this integrative DNA is injected beyond our mucosal defenses.

If PCR tests had also been carried out with a CT of 20, the number of Covid-positive cases would have been virtually nil, and there would not have been so much panic surrounding this pandemic.

Resources

Pascal Najadi’s blood results

Open letter from Prof. Dr. Bhakdi

* https://www.covidhub.ch/vaccines-produisent-proteine-spike-apres-2-ans/

Espace membre

Member area